Future of Work
Immigration
Belonging
Social Isolation
Gender
Climate Policy
Social Media
Food
Supply Chains
Circular Economy
Community
Nature
Waste
Identity
Housing
Art
Climate
Fashion
Media
Wellbeing
Health
Sport
Culture
Technology
Care System
Government
Politics
Law
Urban Design
Inequality
AI
Education
Eoin Joseph
BASc Year 1

The Media, Fearmongering and AI

Does the media engage in fearmongering when discussing AI and job displacement, and if so, how does this influence public perception?
Media
AI
Social Media
Future of Work

Summary

Methods
Sentiment Analysis
Surveys
Data Analysis
Disciplinary perspectives
Psychology
Media Science

This project set out to explore how media outlets might deliberately use fearmongering tactics on pertinent topics to drive views and clicks, rather than accurately presenting the positive aspects and realities of the situation. Specifically, it examined the portrayal of artificial intelligence in three major UK news sources: the BBC, The Times and The Telegraph. By analysing the content these outlets publish and comparing it with public perception, the project aimed to uncover intriguing insights into media influence and public understanding.

Approach and Methodology

The project began by identifying a problem area: the potential bias and fearmongering in media portrayals of AI and job displacement. This focus enabled the exploration of how media may prioritise sensationalism over accurate representation, impacting public perception.

The research utilised both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitatively, surveys were conducted to gather empirical data on public perceptions of AI and job displacement. Qualitatively, sentiment analysis was performed on headlines from BBC, The Times, and The Telegraph to examine the emotional tone and potential bias in media portrayals of AI.

Data was collected from various articles and headlines from the selected media sources, spanning a specific time period. The survey data included responses from diverse demographic groups, providing insights into public awareness and concerns about AI. The sentiment analysis categorised headlines into positive, negative, or neutral portrayals to understand the media's stance on AI and job displacement.

The research integrated perspectives from media studies, data science, and psychology. Media studies provided the framework for content and sentiment analysis, data science facilitated the processing and analysis of large datasets, and psychology offered insights into the impact of fear-inducing narratives on public perception.

The synthesis involved combining the quantitative survey results with qualitative sentiment analysis to form a comprehensive understanding of media portrayals of AI. This approach allowed for a nuanced interpretation of how media bias and sensationalism influence public perception, highlighting the need for balanced and accurate journalism.

Proposal/Outcome

The outcome of this project was a comprehensive analysis titled "AI in the Headlines: Media’s Power Over Public Perception." The study revealed that media coverage significantly influences public perception of AI, often leaning towards fearmongering, particularly in The Times and The Telegraph, in contrast to the BBC's more balanced reporting. The survey data highlighted that the most common public fears included job displacement, reduced human interaction, and ethical concerns, often exacerbated by media narratives. The conclusion emphasized the necessity for balanced, fact-based reporting and increased public education to reduce unwarranted fears and foster a more informed understanding of AI.

Beyond Outcomes

Through this project, I learned the profound impact of media on shaping public perception and the importance of balanced journalism. My key takeaway is the necessity for media literacy and critical thinking among the public to discern sensationalism from factual reporting. Beyond the final outcome, I am most proud of engaging with research methods to investigate a very prevalent topic within reality. The research used provided a comprehensive understanding of media influence on AI perceptions.

Want to learn more about this project?

Here is some student work from their formal assignments. Please note it may contain errors or unfinished elements. It is shared to offer insights into our programme and build a knowledge exchange community.

Summary

Methods
Sentiment Analysis
Surveys
Data Analysis
Disciplinary perspectives
Psychology
Media Science

This project set out to explore how media outlets might deliberately use fearmongering tactics on pertinent topics to drive views and clicks, rather than accurately presenting the positive aspects and realities of the situation. Specifically, it examined the portrayal of artificial intelligence in three major UK news sources: the BBC, The Times and The Telegraph. By analysing the content these outlets publish and comparing it with public perception, the project aimed to uncover intriguing insights into media influence and public understanding.

Approach and Methodology

The project began by identifying a problem area: the potential bias and fearmongering in media portrayals of AI and job displacement. This focus enabled the exploration of how media may prioritise sensationalism over accurate representation, impacting public perception.

The research utilised both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitatively, surveys were conducted to gather empirical data on public perceptions of AI and job displacement. Qualitatively, sentiment analysis was performed on headlines from BBC, The Times, and The Telegraph to examine the emotional tone and potential bias in media portrayals of AI.

Data was collected from various articles and headlines from the selected media sources, spanning a specific time period. The survey data included responses from diverse demographic groups, providing insights into public awareness and concerns about AI. The sentiment analysis categorised headlines into positive, negative, or neutral portrayals to understand the media's stance on AI and job displacement.

The research integrated perspectives from media studies, data science, and psychology. Media studies provided the framework for content and sentiment analysis, data science facilitated the processing and analysis of large datasets, and psychology offered insights into the impact of fear-inducing narratives on public perception.

The synthesis involved combining the quantitative survey results with qualitative sentiment analysis to form a comprehensive understanding of media portrayals of AI. This approach allowed for a nuanced interpretation of how media bias and sensationalism influence public perception, highlighting the need for balanced and accurate journalism.

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Block quote

Ordered list

  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2
  3. Item 3

Unordered list

  • Item A
  • Item B
  • Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

Superscript

Subscript

Beyond Outcomes

Through this project, I learned the profound impact of media on shaping public perception and the importance of balanced journalism. My key takeaway is the necessity for media literacy and critical thinking among the public to discern sensationalism from factual reporting. Beyond the final outcome, I am most proud of engaging with research methods to investigate a very prevalent topic within reality. The research used provided a comprehensive understanding of media influence on AI perceptions.

Proposal/Outcome

The outcome of this project was a comprehensive analysis titled "AI in the Headlines: Media’s Power Over Public Perception." The study revealed that media coverage significantly influences public perception of AI, often leaning towards fearmongering, particularly in The Times and The Telegraph, in contrast to the BBC's more balanced reporting. The survey data highlighted that the most common public fears included job displacement, reduced human interaction, and ethical concerns, often exacerbated by media narratives. The conclusion emphasized the necessity for balanced, fact-based reporting and increased public education to reduce unwarranted fears and foster a more informed understanding of AI.

Want to learn more about this project?

Here is some student work from their formal assignments. Please note it may contain errors or unfinished elements. It is shared to offer insights into our programme and build a knowledge exchange community.

Author's Final Reflection

Personally, I grew in my ability to conduct thorough research, combining qualitative and quantitative methods effectively. I am most proud of creating a holistic approach, particularly how sentiment analysis and public surveys provided a nuanced view of media bias and its effects. This experience has deepened my understanding of media's power and the importance of fostering an informed and discerning audience.

Overall LIS Journey

I am a cycling coach for people aged 5 and up who have never ridden a bike in their life. I am also a judge for an awards called the Stephen Lloyd Awards, where charities propose their ideas and future plans in the hope to prevail and win £25,000.

Academic References

Further Information

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Pharetra vestibulum praesent sapien bibendum id egestas leo pellentesque adipiscing.

View the full project

About me

I am a driven person who loves a challenge. I enjoy spending my time with friends, playing football alongside the LIS squad and enjoy Formula 1. I enjoy all types of music and am one to appreciate nature. My time so far at LIS has been amazing, challenging at times but my mind has been stretched and I have learnt so much. I am looking forward to the next two years and to continue to meet amazing people.

Other Related Projects

Back to the repository

Language, Learning, and YouTube

Automating the CEFR Assessment of User-like Generated videos for Language Learning

Education
Community-Scale Plastic Recycling Workspaces

From Waste to Resource: A Cost Model for Efficient Community-Scale Plastic Recycling

Waste
Community
Community Land Ownership and Native Woodland Restoration

Investigating Community-Owned Forest Initiatives as a Vehicle for Native Woodland Restoration in the Scottish Highlands: A Case Study Approach

Nature
Community
Climate